A Canadian father grounded his twelve year old after she posted pictures of herself on an internet dating site and argued with her stepmother. Pretty normal, except for the dating site stuff. But she didn't like being grounded from the field trip. So she moved to her mother's house, and sued to have the father's punishment overturned. And the court agreed with the little brat. It decided that she had been punished enough, and since she was living with the mother the father's punishment didn't apply. The father is the custodial parent.
What do I think the court should have done? Sent the child back to the custodial parent, and dismissed the case as the nonsense that it was. Wasn't there something important that could have been taking up the court's time?
Source
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment